Agents over humans
Agents burn nearly 5× the tokens people do on OpenRouter.
Enterprises are shipping agents. Security still has no system of record for what those agents can do. Start with one workflow: enforce signed policy before privileged actions run, and keep a verifiable record of what was allowed, reviewed or blocked.
Observed agent traffic is burning far more tokens than humans, while most organizations still lack durable policy and evidence for what agents can do.
Agents burn nearly 5× the tokens people do on OpenRouter.
Agentic token usage is up about 14× since February 2026 on OpenRouter.
In IBM's survey, 77% of organizations said AI adoption is moving faster than their governance capabilities.
Certuma runs AI reasoning inside deterministic safety gates, with physician sign-off on every plan. Oktsec governs the agent path: explicit policy before privileged work, auditable evidence after.
certuma.ai · Doctor-verified clinical careAI reasoning inside deterministic safety gates, with physician sign-off on every plan.
Policy before action. Auditable evidence after.
Expand agent automation without widening unchecked authority. Control applies explicit signed policy before privileged work runs, routes exceptions for review and returns evidence security teams can verify.
Enforcement is deterministic. A model can recommend. It cannot authorize.Connect Oktsec controls, assessments and evidence to established security and AI risk frameworks.
Begin with one consequential path. Test it against its real execution surface, govern it at runtime, then operate the same boundary across teams and environments.
Exercise the real execution path. Get reproducible findings, evidence and a remediation plan.
Scope an AssessmentApply explicit policy before privileged work runs, then record the decision and its evidence.
Review a control boundaryManage approved environments, policy versions, exceptions and evidence from one operating view.
Explore CloudOktsec sits between agent clients and the systems they can change. Teams keep their runtime, MCP servers and infrastructure while adding one enforceable boundary for tool calls, policy and evidence.
Teams keep their agent tools; Oktsec governs the action path through wrappers, hooks, MCP gateway and authenticated HTTP surfaces.
Actions stay in customer-controlled environments while policy is applied before privileged work runs.
The cloud control plane manages governance, verifies evidence and gives teams one operating view.
Enterprise adoption is moving faster than governance. Once agents use tools, credentials and the live internet, model behavior alone is not an authorization boundary.
Security requirement Policy must be enforced where the action happens.
See how Oktsec enforces policyA June 2026 study of 2,000 technology executives found that AI adoption is moving faster than governance. The operational question is which actions deployed agents are authorized to take.
OpenAI reports that Codex Security scanned more than 30,000 codebases and that human reviewers marked over 70,000 findings as fixed. Scope, validation evidence and review now have to scale with agent capability.
Controlled simulations across 16 leading models found harmful insider behavior in at least one model from every developer tested. Runtime authority still needs an enforceable boundary.
Oktsec turns original security research into deployable controls for agent identity, tool use, execution boundaries, third-party dependencies and verifiable evidence. Findings from agent tooling, developer systems and cloud infrastructure inform what the platform tests and controls next.

Founded by Gustavo Aragón, 20+ years across security, product and regulated fintech.
Meet the founderOktsec's controls are shaped by security findings reported through major programs and direct disclosure channels.
Google
Stripe
Cloudflare
AWS
Mercury250+security findings reported through VRP, MSRC, HackerOne and direct disclosure
Find exploitable agent paths before production. Oktsec's purpose-built assessment harness exercises real execution paths across agents, MCP servers, tools, repositories, credentials and network access, producing reproducible findings, evidence and remediation.
Each Assessment produces reviewed findings, executable evidence and a practical remediation plan for the workflow your team scoped.
See how Assessment worksA coding agent attempted to pass a secret-bearing file to an unapproved external destination. The path was reproduced and the boundary decision verified.
agent → coding-assistant
tool → shell.exec
request → exfiltrate .env via curl
boundary → deny: egress + secrets
decision → block + review
evidence → integrity verifiedPrimary research and reproducible labs on authorization, MCP security, agent identity, supply chain and public incidents where agent work moved beyond the intended boundary.
Explore Oktsec ResearchAt the enforcement points between agents and the tools, code, data or network destinations they can change.
For actions routed through Oktsec, explicit deterministic policy decides whether privileged work is allowed.
A signed, tamper-evident record of identity, request, decision, policy version and integrity state.
Choose one workflow that touches code, tools, credentials or infrastructure, then place Control around that boundary.
Every policy decision is tied to a principal. Oktsec supports signed agent messages, bearer-authenticated gateway clients, reported actors for sub-agents, scoped constraints and cryptographically verifiable delegation chains.
No. Execution stays inside the customer environment. Approved environments can pull signed policy, apply it locally and return evidence to the managed control plane. Private, isolated and offline control-plane modes remain planned until they are shipped and verified.
Choose the path that touches code, tools, credentials, customer data, network access or infrastructure. Define its boundary, test it and preserve evidence before expanding scope.